I stumbled on
this blog post the other day, seemingly telling us that the New Yorker deems it ok to refer to a blog post as a "blog".
"Aaaaargh" I say. It's one of my pet hates and has been for a few years. A blog is a virtual place that contains a collection of blog posts, an abbreviation of the word "weblog".
When I see fellows, usually those eternal social networking sorts, saying on Twitter that they've just written or published a blog it really winds me up. I'd even got to the stage of thinking that I need to chill out a bit. These things:
a - aren't that important
b - are not really set in stone anyhow.
So reading the aforementioned blog post made me feel a bit vindicated. It's clearly not just me, other people evidently feel the same way, though not the New Yorker.
It's a blog post when we're talking about one "article". Calling it a blog is like saying that a random page from a fellow's diary is a diary. It's not, the diary is the collection of entries.
Anyone else feel strongly about this too?
Besides, since when have the old Septics been experts on the English language anyhow?
3 comments:
i wonder if the NY would be cool if articles were similarly referred to as newspapers or magazines.
I'm reassured that it wasn't just me DB!
I'm with you guys on this!
Post a Comment